Skip to main content

Table 1 Description of the application of implementation science frameworks linked to each project objective and human-centered co-design phases

From: The co-development and pilot evaluation of the Siblings Training, Empowerment, and Advocacy Kit (Siblings TEAKit) to support youth and young adult siblings of individuals with a disability: A participatory action research qualitative study protocol

Project Objective

Human-centered Co-design [58]

Application of Implementation Science Frameworks

  

COM-B Component [63]

Theoretical Domains Framework Constructs [64]

To co-develop an evidence-based toolkit to provide education and training to support siblings in their roles

Ideate: Workshops

Capability

Knowledge

Cognitive and interpersonal skills

Memory attention and decision processes

Behavioural regulation

Opportunity

Social influences

Environment context and resources

Motivation

Social professional role and identity

Beliefs about capabilities

Optimism

Intentions

Goals

Beliefs about consequences

Reinforcement

Emotions

  

Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research [65, 66]

  

Components

Constructs

To further refine the prototypes of the toolkit

Prototype: Focus groups

Innovation

Source

Evidence-base

Relative advantage

Adaptability

Trialability

Complexity

Design

Cost

Inner setting

Structural characteristics

Relational connections

Communications

Culture

Outer setting

Critical incidents

Local attitudes

Local conditions

Partnerships and connections

Policies and laws

Financing

External pressure

Individuals involved

High-level leaders

Mid-level leaders

Opinion leaders

Implementation facilitators

Implementation leads

Implementation team members

Other implementation support

Innovation deliverers

Innovation recipients

Implementation process

Teaming

Assessing needs

Assessing context

Planning

Tailoring strategies

Engaging

Doing

Reflecting and evaluating

Adapting